Admiral Lord Hill-Norton, July 2000
[We are grateful
to James Fox for sharing this interview.]
Lord Hill-Norton
is a five-star Admiral and the former Head of the British Ministry
of Defense who was kept in the dark about the UFO subject during
his official capacities. In this short interview, he states that
this subject has great significance and should no longer be denied
and kept secret. He emphatically states, “…that there
is a serious possibility that we are being visited — and have
been visited for many years — by people from outer space,
from other civilizations; that it behooves us to find out who they
are, where they come from, and what they want. This should be the
subject of rigorous scientific investigation, and not the subject
of rubbishing by tabloid newspapers.”
I know a good
bit about the Bentwaters incident. I’ve interviewed a number
of the people who took part in it, and what I have decided after
careful thought, is that there are only two explanations for what
happened that night in Suffolk. The first is that the people concerned
— including Colonel Halt, who was, at the time, the Deputy
Commander of the Base, and a lot of his soldiers — claim that
something from outside the Earth’s atmosphere landed at their
air force base. They went and stood by it; they inspected it; they
photographed it.
The following
day they took tests on the ground where it had been and found radioactive
traces; they reported this. Colonel Halt wrote a memorandum, which
was sent to our Ministry of Defense. He has appeared on British
television at least once, to my knowledge — possibly more
often — in which he has repeated, effectively, what he said
in that memorandum. What he said is what I have just described.
That is one explanation — that it actually happened as Colonel
Halt reported.
The other explanation
is that it didn’t. In that case, one is bound to assume that
Colonel Halt and all his men were hallucinating. My position is
perfectly clear — either of those explanations is of the utmost
defense interest. It has been reported and claimed — and I,
myself, have raised it to ministers at the Defense Ministry in this
country — that nothing they have been informed about regarding
UFOs is of defense interest. Surely, to any sensible person, either
of those explanations cannot fail to be of defense interest. That
the Colonel of an American Air Force Base in Suffolk and his military
men are hallucinating when there are nuclear-armed aircraft on the
base — this must be of defense interest.
And, if indeed
what he says took place, did take place — and why on Earth
should he make it up — then, surely, the entry of a vehicle
from outer space (and certainly not manmade) to a defense base in
this country also cannot fail to be of defense interest. It simply
isn’t any good for our ministers — and the Ministry
of Defense in particular — to say that nothing took place
that December night in Suffolk, or that it is not of defense interest.
It simply isn’t true.
Since my name
has become connected with UFO matters in quite a big way in this
country, and in one or two other countries too, I have frequently
been asked why a person of my background — a former Chief
of the Defense Staff, a former Chairman of the NATO Military Committee
— why I think there is a cover-up, or what the reasons may
be for government’s wishing to cover up the facts about UFOs.
A number of explanations have often been put forward. The most frequent,
and perhaps the most plausible, is the government’s concern
(which [is] primarily that of the United States, and that of my
own country) over the public’s reaction if they [were] told
the truth — which is that there are objects in our atmosphere
which are technically miles in advance of anything that we can deploy,
that we have no means of stopping them coming here, and that we
have no defense against them, should they be hostile.
I believe governments
fear that if they did disclose those facts, people would panic:
people would rush about and jam switchboards like they did that
famous day in New Jersey, when there was a spoof that the Martians
[had] landed — people will go mad, and they will jump up and
down. I don’t believe that at all — I’ve said
so in print. I do not believe that people today, in the 21st century,
are going to panic at that sort of information. After all, they
have put up with the introduction of nuclear weapons and the destruction
of two Japanese cities 50 years ago. They take as a matter of course
that we can land vehicles on Mars — land to the precise instant,
forecast years before. So why should they panic? They are much more
interested in doing the pools or the lottery. They would shrug their
shoulders and take it as a matter of course. Anyway, they don’t
trust politicians, in my experience.
What I’d
like to say is that there is a serious possibility that we are being
visited — and have been visited for many years — by
people from outer space, from other civilizations; that it behooves
us to find out who they are, where they come from, and what they
want. This should be the subject of rigorous scientific investigation,
and not the subject of rubbishing by tabloid newspapers.
It seems to
me that the Bentwaters incident is a classic case where an apparent
intrusion into our airspace — and indeed, a landing in our
country — occurred, which was witnessed by serious-minded
people in the military — responsible people, doing a responsible
job. And, Bentwaters is, in a sense, a benchmark for how not to
deal with these matters in the future.
[See the testimony
of Larry Warren, MOD official Nick Pope, Clifford Stone, Lori Rehfeldt,
and others regarding the Bentwaters landing event in the UK. I should
also mention that I personally spent a couple of hours with Lord
Hill-Norton, and he was very concerned about the secrecy surrounding
this subject — and the fact that he had been deceived about
it. Notwithstanding his five star Admiral status and his position
as former head of the Ministry of Defense, he was never officially
briefed on the subject. This is consistent with my experiences with
President Clinton’s staff and his first Director of Central
Intelligence (CIA Director) James Woolsey, senior members of Congress,
very senior Pentagon officials, including the Director of Intelligence
(J-2) for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and a sitting Director of the
Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) — all of whom I have personally
briefed, and had been left out of the loop on this very important
matter — or were directly denied information when inquiries
were made. This is, of course, a dangerous situation. The secrecy
itself is a great threat to the national — and world —
security, makes a mockery of democracy and our constitutional form
of government, and must be corrected by official action. SG]